Permalink for Comment #1375242433 by RoundTheRoom

, comment by RoundTheRoom
RoundTheRoom @J_D_G said:
I'd say they're on a fairly similar level of rote, uninspired and plodding, and thus difficult/unnecessary to compare to each other.

I agree with this.
First sets these days are what they are. If you don't get the Tweezer/Curtain With/DWD/Undermind (and let's be real, these are rare in the first set), you're likely looking at your set highlight in Split/Maze/Bathtub/Wolfman's, and usually those songs are kept "in the box" these days.
I enjoy all sets of Phish, I just enjoy your average 2013 Set II about 1,000x more than Set I.
MPP2 (and others) aside.
Score: 1    
Phish.net Login
Secure Login
Register | Forgot Password
Support Phish.net & Mbird
Make a Donation
Phish.net is a project of the non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.
Recent Blog Posts
Results of the 9th Runaway Open 2024-11-02
Albany3 Recap: Never Play It The Same Way Once 2024-10-29
Albany2 Recap: The Use of Keys to Every Door 2024-10-27
Albany1 Recap: A Requiem For Phil 2024-10-26
Surrender To The Flow #86: Albany Divided Sky Benefit 2024 2024-10-23
HAPPY 60TH BIRTHDAY, TREY! 2024-09-30
Phish Studies 101 webinar almost here! 2024-09-23
From the Forum 2: "Mike's Song" in late '92 and "Weekapaug Groove" in early '93 2024-09-19
Summer Tour 2024 Reprise 2024-09-15
The First and Last Words from Dick's 2024-09-07


Phish.net

Phish.net is a non-commercial project run by Phish fans and for Phish fans under the auspices of the all-volunteer, non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.

This project serves to compile, preserve, and protect encyclopedic information about Phish and their music.

Credits | Terms Of Use | Legal | DMCA

© 1990-2024  The Mockingbird Foundation, Inc. | Hosted by Linode