Phish.net is a non-commercial project run by Phish fans and for Phish fans under the auspices of the all-volunteer, non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.
This project serves to compile, preserve, and protect encyclopedic information about Phish and their music.
Credits | Terms Of Use | Legal | DMCA
The Mockingbird Foundation is a non-profit organization founded by Phish fans in 1996 to generate charitable proceeds from the Phish community.
And since we're entirely volunteer – with no office, salaries, or paid staff – administrative costs are less than 2% of revenues! So far, we've distributed over $2 million to support music education for children – hundreds of grants in all 50 states, with more on the way.
1. Whether or not you think 12/7/97 II is "light", I really cannot get behind the notion that the show is "two first sets". For one thing, there are *precious few* first sets in Phish's history that matches 12/7/97 I. For another, if they played 12/7/97 II as a first set today (or in any other year, for that matter), peoples' heads would explode.
2. I think the 3/1/97 Wolfman's is getting short shrift, even as "more than respectable"; not only is it a very strong funk jam to my ears, but its historical significance is gigantic, just as much as something like the Bangor Tweezer or Murat Gin. The rest of the show I'm fine with not making the Top 20.
3. I like the shout-out to 12/12/97. Both Albany shows deserve more play.
4. 11/22/97 II is part of my favorite show of all time, and (with the possible exception of Halley's) you could say the exact same thing about that set as you did about 12/29/97 II. I'm not surprised that 12/30/97 would be held in higher esteem, but I am surprised that 20 shows are deemed superior to it (actually more, counting the other Honorable Mentions).
5. To piggyback on @nichobert's above point, the dark horse Europe show I'd want to see is 7/10/97.