Phish.net is a non-commercial project run by Phish fans and for Phish fans under the auspices of the all-volunteer, non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.
This project serves to compile, preserve, and protect encyclopedic information about Phish and their music.
Credits | Terms Of Use | Legal | DMCA
The Mockingbird Foundation is a non-profit organization founded by Phish fans in 1996 to generate charitable proceeds from the Phish community.
And since we're entirely volunteer – with no office, salaries, or paid staff – administrative costs are less than 2% of revenues! So far, we've distributed over $2 million to support music education for children – hundreds of grants in all 50 states, with more on the way.
Review by raidcehlalred
but to @noob:
Second Mike's Songs jams can either be very good pieces of business, or a slightly extended version of the Mike's Song first jam in a different key....
is the 'boolean' logic necessary? can't the second jam be 'very good' AND an extended version of the jam in a different key - affording a who knows what may happen 'expectation?' like a > paugh; or a > tune which better fits said key?
be the second jam the result of an accident, or pressure from a tuba player, don't you find this welcome news in a tour already rife with great playing and 'fresh' ideas?
i just don't see the piper coming otherwise (maybe 'next time' they'll even allow for an actual build).
these new shows are great. but many of the truly great shows feature 'full' mike's and the energy which ensues....